W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Spec wording for operation safety

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:09:18 +0600
Message-ID: <0fcb01c40c4a$fe26b7c0$02c8a8c0@watson.ibm.com>
To: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: "Roberto Chinnici" <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>

I've incorporated this text and the proper reference. Thanks David!


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Booth" <dbooth@w3.org>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Roberto Chinnici"
<Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>; "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>;
"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>; "Jeffrey
Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:36 AM
Subject: Spec wording for operation safety

> Editors,
> For Section 2.3.1, description of "{safety}", here is suggested wording to
> fill in this description, to replace the existing paragraph:
> [[
> {safety} A boolean indicating whether the operation is asserted to be safe
> (as defined in WebArch
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#safe-interaction ) for
> of the described service to invoke.
> If this property is false or is not set, then no assertion has been made
> about the safety of the operation, thus the operation may or may not be
> However, an operation SHOULD be marked safe if it meets the criteria for a
> safe interaction defined in WebArch
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20031209/#safe-interaction .
> The default value of this property is false.
> ]]
> --
> David Booth
> W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 13:10:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:47 UTC