First, this technical draft proposes a simple language and is a good starting point. At the process level, [1] Is WSD working group the right one to consider or produce another schema language? Do we have sufficient interest for this? Possible areas for expansion are, [2] schema component model [3] mapping from XML representation to schema component model [4] validation rules [5] polymorphic types (similar to xsi:type) [6] simple wildcard mechanism [7] versioning [8] 'schema/import' jams both import and include mechanism; split this into 2 Possible enhancements to be considered are, [9] simplify: eliminate array construct; can be achieved via, <element name="Records" type="tns:Record" dimensions="1"/> [10] .. Jacek, Paul and I will work offline to investigate (and execute, if necessary) what the next steps are for this SOAP Data Model Schema Language. Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu asirv at webmethods dot com http://www.webmethods.com/Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 12:15:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:30 GMT