W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: updated draft to put F&P in more places

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 20:18:30 +0600
Message-ID: <030101c45d1a$cb268a50$19494109@LANKABOOK>
To: "Roberto Chinnici" <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>, "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

"Roberto Chinnici" <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM> writes:
> 
> By the way, in the spirit of hoisting faults to the same level as
> operations, I think that if we had to choose between interface faults
> or fault references as the only place f&p's are allowed to appear at,
> I'd choose the former.

Big +1 to this! I'll be a lot happier saying they're missing
in fault reference components rather than the way it there now.

In any case I think we should just allow them everywhere (which 
means just add to the two remaining places).

Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 10:19:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT