W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

RE: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP binding and showing messages

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:16:04 -0700
Message-ID: <32D5845A745BFB429CBDBADA57CD41AF08370540@ussjex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

hmm, I don't recall that my "defaultWebMethod" on operations proposal was voted down.  But I wouldn't be surprised if I missed that.  I've been meaning to follow the trail on this issue.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 1:27 PM
> To: David Orchard; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Sample Application described in WSDL using HTTP 
> binding and
> showing messages
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> > This is potential primer material that explores how to use the
> > WSDL http binding to describe interactions with an HTTP service. 
> 
> Thanks for writing this up; very useful indeed! Big +1 for getting
> it into the primer.
> 
> > Interacting using the x-www-form-uriencoded style
> > WSDL
> > 
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <wsdl:definitions xmlns:musicw="http://example.com/Artist" 
> xmlns:wsdl="">
> > <xs:import href="Music-Artist.xsd"/>
> > <wsdl:interface name="Artist">
> > <wsdl:operation name="ArtistSearch" method="GET">
>                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> What's that?? Unless I was totally asleep at the wheel I don't 
> recall operation/@method. What we have is of course the ability
> to indicate operation safety via @safety .. is that what you
> meant to use?
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 18:16:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT