- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:02:44 +0100
- To: <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <jacek.kopecky@deri.at>
- Cc: <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Issue 98 was resolved at the 5th February telcon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/att-0035/040205-ws-desc-irc.htm#item07 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/att-0035/040205-ws-desc-irc.htm> http://tinyurl.com/3y7fy followed by Jacek withrawing his proposal, Issue 113: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Feb/att-0035/040205-ws-desc-irc.htm#item08 http://tinyurl.com/yq25p Paul -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] Sent: Thu 10/06/2004 15:40 To: Downey,PS,Paul,XSJ67A C; jacek.kopecky@deri.at Cc: jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr; mark.nottingham@bea.com; www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: RE: Issue 217: Syntax for multiple styles As Jacek points out, we did reject this proposal already, and I don't see any new information being presented. I'm reluctant to reopen issues, but I'm willing to do it along the rules proposed in many of the latest charters being approved - that is, a supermajority (2/3) of the members in Good Standing. I won't put this on this week's telcon, but perhaps next week's (or an email poll).
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 16:02:53 UTC