W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Issue 212: Generic operations (proposal)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:24:33 +0200
Message-ID: <40C80CB1.9020008@crf.canon.fr>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org

+1.

I'm not sure I understand the second sentence though (the part before 
"i.e.").

JJ.

Mark Nottingham wrote:

>
> As explained in issue 212 [1], I think it would be valuable to allow  
> the description of a "default" binding operation component for a  
> particular endpoint, if the binding information is the same for many 
> or  all of the operations that it implements.
>
> To enable this, I propose the following specific changes:
>
> - Add the following to 2.1.11, after the bullet list:
> """A Binding Operation component without an {operation reference}  
> property is to be considered the default Binding Operation Component  
> for that Binding component; that is, it will be used by any 
> operations  in the interface that does not have a corresponding 
> operation reference  in the binding."""
>
> - Add to the following sentence:
> """This includes Binding Operation components without an {operation  
> reference} property; i.e., there may be only one such Binding 
> Operation  component in a Binding component."""
>
>  - In 2.1.12, change:
>   A REQUIRED ref attribute information item as described below...
> to:
>   An OPTIONAL ref attribute information item as described below...
>
> Regards,
>
>
> 1.  http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd- 
> issues.html#x212
>
> -- 
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 03:25:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT