W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

RE: trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate Jacek's text

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:16:12 -0700
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA203E26CC2@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I'd suggest you put it in the Core spec as the WG agreed.  Putting it
somewhere else would mean reopening the issue, and being explicit about
what "the purpose of the binding" is in the Core spec doesn't seem to
cause obvious harm.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:04 PM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: trying to execute editorial action item to incorporate
Jacek's
> text
> 
> 
> I'm trying to do the following AI:
> 
> ?         2004-04-29: Part 1 editors to adopt Jacek's "purpose of the
>                       binding" text, without "interchangeable"
>                       endpoints, and using "confidentiality" (or
>                       similar) instead of TLS.
> 
> 
> I picked up the text from:
>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0077.html
> 
> While trying to splice this into part1 I've convinced myself that
> this is not part1 kinda text. This really belongs in the primer
> as some more verbiage on the roles of interace/binding/service
> stuff as well as an example of a feature that makes sense to be
> present at all levels.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2004 13:18:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT