W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Features: required implementation and use (was Re: Describing which blobs are to be optimized.)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 21:05:09 +0600
Message-ID: <08a701c44d6a$00d7a0a0$d14f4109@LANKABOOK>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <paul.downey@bt.com>, <hugo@w3.org>, <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
Cc: <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes:
> > 1) that setting the MTOM feature for a message indicates that a
> >    sender may optionally send soap+xml or a mime package, but the 
> >    receiver mustUnderstand MTOM messages regardless of the state 
> >    within an MEP. If a receiver is unable to process MTOM messages 
> >    then it should use another endpoint, binding or interface.
> 
> I'm not sure I understand the above. If the WSDL description of an
> endpoint says that the endpoint supports MTOM, then that endpoint had
> better be able to consume and/or emit MTOM messages ( depending on
> whether you can state MTOM support at the binding, operation or
> input/output level ).

+1.

Sanjiva.
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 11:05:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT