Ugo, Did you mean Base64Binary and not base64Decimal here? Regards, Prasad Ugo Corda wrote: >>Perhaps the right middle ground is to provide a hook that designates >>elements that are guaranteed to be in base64 canonical form, and that are >> >> >>suggested as optimization candidates? >> >> > >Could that be achieved by defining a subtype of base64Decimal that only >allows canonical representations, and associating that subtype in the >WSDL with the element we care about? > >Ugo > >Received on Friday, 4 June 2004 20:29:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:31 GMT