- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:46:38 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Jun/0001.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Erik Ackerman, Adi Sakala, Tom Jordahl,
William Vambenepe, Prasad Yendluri, Jean-Jacques Moreau
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- May 19-21 FTF [.1, .2, .3] and Summary [.4]
- May 27th [.5] Late regrets from Jeff.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0075.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0074.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0073.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0072.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0087.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for
test suite.
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-04-29: Part 1 editors to adopt Jacek's "purpose of the
binding" text, without "interchangeable"
endpoints, and using "confidentiality" (or
similar) instead of TLS.
? 2004-05-19: Media type editors to implement these
resolutions prior to publication.
? 2004-05-19: Editors to include in the primer an example
that uses MTOM. (Issue 72)
? 2004-05-19: Editors to make propogation of modules and f&p
use the nearing enclosing scope. (Issue 180)
? 2004-05-19: Editors to fix component model to remove
default* properties, use mapping from syntax
instead. (Issue 182)
? 2004-05-20: Editors to incorporate Hugo's full potato
proposal. (Issue 54)
? 2004-05-20: David Orchard to update HTTP binding to
include discussion of how to generate an
accepts header from schema annotations
conformant to the media types extension
document, and to use outputSerialization
based on that information.
? 2004-05-20: Editors to incorporate http:{properties} into
binding.
? 2004-05-21: Sanjiva to implement the resolution that
@soapaction not there means no soapaction.
(Issue 1)
? 2004-05-21: Part 2 Editors to add such a statement.
(Issue 191)
? 2004-05-21: Part 3 Editors to add a statement to relate
each of the two soap meps to wsdl meps.
(Issue 191)
? 2004-05-21: Editors to add ednotes to the spec to
indicate areas that had contention. (Issue
190)
? 2004-05-21: Editors to remove @separator from HTTP
binding. (Issue 190)
? 2004-05-21: DaveO to write up a scenario to motivate path
creation on a per-operation basis. (Issue
190)
? 2004-05-21: Editors to write up that we allow
http:version etc. in the soap binding when
the protocol is http. (Issue 190)
? 2004-05-21: Editors to update part 3 to say that for SOAP
Response MEPs the URI will be generated
following the HTTP binding rules for
generating a URI (for GET). (Issue 61)
? 2004-05-21: Editors to update soap binding default rules
to allow use of MTOM. (Issue 184)
? 2004-05-21: Amy to provide wording to go into spec to say
that our bindings only support the identified
MEPs but others can be handled if appropriate
rules are defined elsewhere. (Issue 155)
DONE [.2] 2004-05-27: Hugo will specify how to use XOP, MTOM re
Issue 154.
DONE [.3] 2004-05-27: Glen will open an issue on How to mark in
WSDL which elements are optimizable.
(Deferred till Hugo's is complete.)
DONE [.4] 2004-05-27: Paul will make a proposal (to map HTTP faults
to abstract faults) within one week or drop
the suggestion.
? 2004-05-27: Editors to add http:faultSerialization
attribute.
? 2004-05-27: DaveO will write up better description of
this issue (189).
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0088.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0089.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0086.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTFs
- August 2-4 (London)
Logistics [.1], registration [.2].
- September 14-16 (Toronto) [.3]
b. Review of I18N WS Task Force documents [.4]
c. Public photos? [.5]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-08-f2f.htm
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0064.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004May/0000.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0034.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Jun/0000.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Task Force Status.
a. Media type description
- Update on publication of 1st Working Draft [.4]
b. QA & Testing
- Suggested QA plan [.1]
- More details from Arthur [.2]
- Interop bake-off
c. Schema versioning
- Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft "charter."
- Henry's validate-twice write-up [.3]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0029/QA_Oper
ational_Checklist.htm
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0037.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0019.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0082.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues. Issues list [.1].
- How to mark which elements to optimize (Hugo) [.2]
- (I will catalog Mark N's issues soon).
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0089.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue 154: Multi-part post in HTTP binding [.1]
- Hugo's proposal to close with no action [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x154
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0088.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue 166: Binding of Faults in HTTP Binding [.1]
- Hugo's proposal [.2]
- Paul's fault proposal [.3] Hugo's response [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x166
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0032.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0086.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jun/0002.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue 189: Binding message content to URI [.1]
- Is this DaveO's action item?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x189
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue 158: Setting HTTP headers in the HTTP binding [.1]
- ADD related.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x158
------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution of the above issues completes Part 3!!
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue 112: New headers/body style? [.1]
- ADD proposal [.2]
- friendly amendment [.3]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x112
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0167.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0170.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 130: Need async request/response HTTP binding [.1]
- David Orchard's Async proposal [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x130
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004May/0029.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. XML 1.1 issues (time permitting)
- Issue 174: Tie WSDL conformance to XML conformance? [.1]
- Issue 175: Is it valid for a XML 1.1 document to import or
include a XML 1.0 document (and vice versa)? [.2]
- Issue 176: Can a WSDL 2.0 XML 1.1 document contain (or
reference), a XML Schema 1.0 type description? [.3]
- Issue 177: Normative dependence on XML Schema 1.0 precludes
XML 1.1 [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x174
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x175
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x176
[.4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x177
------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled for future telcons
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Effort to simplify our spec.
- DavidB [.1] and Jonathan [.2] have provided some data points.
- Arthur's suggestion [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0162.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0028.html
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 17:47:33 UTC