W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

RE: in-optional-out?

From: Yaron Goland <ygoland@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:38:52 -0800
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'Amelia A Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <043601c3e50d$326b1540$65e5e40c@bea.com>

3.X In-Optional-Out

This pattern consists of one or two messages, in order, as follows:

   1. A message:
          * indicated by a Message Reference component whose
{messageReference} is 'A' and {direction} is 'in'
          * received from some node N
   2. An optional message:
          * indicated by a Message Reference component whose
{messageReference} is 'B' and {direction} is 'out'
          * sent to node N

This pattern uses the rule 2.2 Message Triggers Fault.

An operation using this message pattern has a {pattern} property with the
value 'http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/in-opt-out'.

Would that work?
	Thanks,
		Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 1:58 AM
> To: Amelia A Lewis; David Orchard
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: in-optional-out?
>
>
>
> +1
>
> (No, not to the nuisance part but the process part ;-))
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Amelia A Lewis" <alewis@tibco.com>
> To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
> Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:18 AM
> Subject: Re: in-optional-out?
>
>
> >
> > If you want it, write it up and propose it to the group for
> inclusion.
> > If you can convince enough folks, it'll likely go in.
> >
> > out-optional-in is there because I made a nuisance of myself.
> >
> > Amy!
> > On Jan 26, 2004, at 3:00 PM, David Orchard wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > There is an out-optional-in but what about in-optional-out?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dave
> > >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 14:39:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:28 GMT