W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Another try at HTTP binding

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:02:50 -0500
To: Roberto Chinnici <roberto.chinnici@sun.com>
Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1074787369.16424.178.camel@jfouffa.w3.org>

On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 21:15, Roberto Chinnici wrote:
> I'm just thinking aloud here, but wouldn't it be better to keep the
> two bindings in two separate documents? I'm not convinced that there's
> going to be that much overlap in readership, plus that approach
> would allow us to publish them indipendently, thus avoiding delaying
> one binding because of issues with the other.

I'm not convinced that we can dissociate the bindings, especially since
our SOAP 1.2 will use HTTP 1.1. I'd like to see to have something like:

<binding ..>
 <operation ..>
   <http:operation method='get'/>
   <soap:operation pattern='soap-response' />

In other words, the SOAP 1.2 binding will rely on the HTTP 1.1 binding.

Received on Thursday, 22 January 2004 11:02:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:46 UTC