W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2004

Re: bugs in WSDL1.1 specs but no reference to issues list?

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:19:44 +0100
Message-ID: <4007F300.4030705@crf.canon.fr>
To: Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org

Dear Joachim,

The specification at the URI you indicate is a document which was 
submitted as input to W3C and published verbatim. Its content will not 
change.

The W3C, in fact this very WG, is working on an enhanced specification, 
WSDL 2.0, which will, when finished, superseed WSDL 1.1.

I hope this helps,

Jean-Jacques Moreau.

Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch wrote:

> hi all,
> 
> i've just noticed that the most recent (?) version of the WSDL 1.1
> specification (located at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl )  contains an old
> error which has has been identified, put on an issue list and closed long
> time ago.
> 
> In the issues list (
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html ) ,
> the error is referred to as error #9 and concerns Example 4 (and others),
> where a port element uses a wrong name-attribute ("StockQuoteBinding") to
> refer to the binding ("StockQuoteSoapBinding") specified in the example.
> 
> I did not find a reference to the issue list or some other errata list, so
> i would like to ask whether the bug was left in the document intentionally
> or not.
> 
> thanks for your time,
> Joachim
> 
> 
> Joachim Peer
> Research Assistant
> MCM Institute, University of St. Gallen
> Blumenbergplatz 9, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
> Phone: ++41 (0) 71 224 3441, Fax: ++41 (0) 71 224 2771
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 16 January 2004 09:25:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:28 GMT