Re: proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings from Umit Yalcinalp on 2004-04-29 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2004)

From: Umit Yalcinalp <umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:38:25 -0700
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <40906AA1.9040105@oracle.com>

+1.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>I suggest we move wsoap:code/wsoap:value to an attribute:
>
>That is, instead of:
>
>      <wsoap:code>
>        <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value>
>        <wsoap:subcode>
>          <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value>
>          <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode>
>        </wsoap:subcode>?
>      </wsoap:code>
>
>we do:
>
>      <wsoap:code value="xs:QName">
>        <wsoap:subcode value="xs:QName">
>          <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode>
>        </wsoap:subcode>?
>      </wsoap:code>
>
>This makes the syntax more consistent with the rest of the
>SOAP binding which is rather attribute-heavy.
>
>Sanjiva.
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Umit Yalcinalp                                  
Consulting Member of Technical Staff
ORACLE
Phone: +1 650 607 6154                          
Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.com

Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:39:15 UTC