+1. Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >I suggest we move wsoap:code/wsoap:value to an attribute: > >That is, instead of: > > <wsoap:code> > <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value> > <wsoap:subcode> > <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value> > <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode> > </wsoap:subcode>? > </wsoap:code> > >we do: > > <wsoap:code value="xs:QName"> > <wsoap:subcode value="xs:QName"> > <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode> > </wsoap:subcode>? > </wsoap:code> > >This makes the syntax more consistent with the rest of the >SOAP binding which is rather attribute-heavy. > >Sanjiva. > > > > -- Umit Yalcinalp Consulting Member of Technical Staff ORACLE Phone: +1 650 607 6154 Email: umit.yalcinalp@oracle.comReceived on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 22:39:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:44 GMT