W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Issue with binding message references in the abstract component model

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:51:30 +0600
Message-ID: <00e601c38015$2dbf0db0$f4c16720@lankabook2>
To: "Roberto Chinnici" <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> writes:
> I know I don't understand the fault rules etc. in the MEP stuff
> yet, but why doesn't the name matter for faults too? In a complex
> MEP there can be faults going in different directions etc. and 
> in such cases it seems to be necessary to say which fault I'm
> talking about when I indicate the actual message contents.

However, I do agree that for the simple In-only and In-Out meps 
(and their corresponding reverse ones) the message references
are indeed irrelevant for faults.

What I'm concerned about is dropping them for the general case.

Received on Sunday, 21 September 2003 13:51:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:44 UTC