RE: On WSDL "operation"

• From: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:16:44 +0100
• To: "'Jacek Kopecky'" <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
• Cc: "'WS Description List'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <009301c37d26$52df21d0$880a090a@kyle>

Jacek:

> If we depart from normal and accessible terminology, 
> education will be a must, but this time starting with 
> confused users, not users who comfortably think they know 
> what the thing is about.

Alas, we have already started down this route, hence my earlier point about
renumbering this work to WSDL 2.0. The portType became interface, we've
removed messages, added aggregation of interfaces. I see the renaming of
operation as a sensible one given the polishing that WSDL is undergoing.

> I still prefer the term operation. 8-)

Lol :-) 

Jim

Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2003 10:16:49 UTC