W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [draft] Agenda: 22-24 Sept 2003 WS Description WG FTF

From: Steve Tuecke <tuecke@mcs.anl.gov>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:04:13 -0500
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030912090408.01e87a98@pop.mcs.anl.gov>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I will not be able to arrive until Tuesday late morning.  (There's a chance 
I may not be able to come at all.  I'm still trying to juggle my 
calender.  But I definitely have an immovable conflict on Monday.)

The two sessions that matter most to me, endpoint references and 
attributes, are both currently scheduled for Monday.  It would be ideal for 
me if these discussion could be moved back to Tuesday afternoon and 
Wednesday morning. However, if that change would be a problem for others 
who are more critical than myself to these discussions, then obviously 
don't move them.

Thanks,
-Steve

At 06:58 PM 9/11/2003, Jonathan Marsh wrote:

>Logistics [1], dial-in numbers [2] (members only).
>
>   [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/3/07/f2fSeptLogistics.html
>   [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/3/07/f2fSeptLogistics.html#Bridge
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>Monday 22 September
>--------------------------------------------------------
>09:00 Introductions and logistics
>     - Assignment of scribes
>       @@@
>     - Agenda fine-tuning
>
>09:15 Removing message.  New Draft [3], schema [4]
>     - Countdown to close the following issues [5].
>       * Issue 27: Remove 'style' attribute [6]
>       * Issue 39: Binding extensions depend on structure of
>                   portType [7]
>       * Issue 40: Binding extensions for SOAP interact in a
>                   complex way [8]
>       * Issue 45: fault/@use should be optional [9]
>       * Issue 48: soap:body/@use should be optional [10]
>       * Issue 63: soap binding violates separation of abstract
>                   and concrete [11]
>
>   [3] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml
>   [4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xsd
>   [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Aug/0004.html
>   [6] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x27
>   [7] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x39
>   [8] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x40
>   [9] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x45
>  [10] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x48
>  [11] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x63
>
>9:30 R085 Describing endpoint references.  [12]
>    - General agreement to add such capability to WSDL, but
>      not agreement on the precise form of the annotations and
>      where in the WSDL they should reside. Proposal
>      from Umit [13], response from Arthur [14].
>    - Related issue (?) dynamic discovery of a service [15].
>    - Arthur to work with Umit to unify approaches.
>
>  [12]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-20
>03-04-22.html
>  [13]
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/att-0024/umit_pr
>oposal.html__charset_ISO-8859-1
>  [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0142.html
>  [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0004.html
>
>10:30 Break
>10:50 Endpoint references (cont.)
>
>12:00 Lunch
>13:00 Attributes
>   - TF revised proposal [16]
>
>[16] TBD
>
>15:00 Break
>15:20 Attributes (cont.)
>
>17:30 Adjourn
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Tuesday 23 September
>-------------------------------------------------------
>09:00 Patterns.  New draft [20]
>     - Choose specific patterns for the standard [21]:
>       1. TF recommendation: drop request-response and multicast-
>          solicit-response patterns, as subsumed by others [22].
>       2. Sanjiva's proposal: drop any pattern not used in a
>          normative binding in our spec.
>       3. Tom's proposal: drop the "multi" patterns.
>       4. Amy's proposal: at least the patterns in WSDL 1.1.
>
>  [20]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.
>xml
>  [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Aug/0010.html
>  [22]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/rec
>ommendations_clean.htm
>
>10:30 Break
>10:50 Patterns (cont.)
>
>11:15 WSDL Validator demo (Arthur)
>
>12:00 Lunch
>13:00 Binding enhancements.  New draft [23, 24]
>   - Unresolved proposal: Drop <soap:binding>: drop @protocol, change
>               <soap:address>: add @protocol.
>
>   - Issue #80: Inappropriate name for binding component [25].
>   - Issue #81: Match between binding/@interface and
>                service/@interface should account for interface
>                inheritance. [26]
>   - Issue #82: Relax binding syntax constraints in favor of
>                semantic constraints [27]
>   - Issue #83: Specify interaction between binding extensions [28]
>   - Issue #84: Are SOAP header faults needed? [29]
>   - Issue #85: HTTP (non-SOAP) binding depends on message/part [30]
>                Philippe to make proposal.
>   - Issue #86: Should we define a new binding element for
>                default rule for wsoap:operation/@soapActionURI.
>                Proposal = interfaceTNS#operation-name. [31]
>
>[23]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml#Bindi
>ng
>[24]
>http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml#Endpo
>int [25] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x80
>[26] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x81
>[27] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x82
>[28] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x83
>[29] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x84
>[30] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x85
>[31] http://tinyurl.com/mwuy#x86
>
>15:00 Break
>15:20 Binding Enhancements (cont.)
>
>17:30 Adjourn
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Wednesday 23 September
>-------------------------------------------------------
>09:00 TBD
>
>10:30 Break
>10:50 TBD
>
>12:00 Adjourn [32]
>
>[32] http://www.cdsusa.com/
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 11:21:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:26 GMT