Re: message exchange patterns and # of parties

• From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
• Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:21:29 +0200
• To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
• Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
• Message-ID: <3F618209.50507@crf.canon.fr>

My recollection is that we were to provide only patterns with 2 parties, 
but that we would not prevent adding patterns with >=3 parties via 
extensibility.

Jean-Jacques.

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

> I remember some discussion during the last F2F about the number
> of parties that may be involved with a single message exchange 
> pattern. I think I was arguing against having more than two
> parties as that's getting more into choreography space.
> 
> What did we decide? Are patterns allowed to have more than 2
> parties participating in a single pattern?
> 
> Sanjiva.

Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 04:21:37 UTC