- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:26:55 +0600
- To: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Jeffrey Schlimmer'" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>, "'Savas Parastatidis'" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, "'WS Description List'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com> writes: > > What I find disturbing is that the group dismissed the rpc syntax (even > though it can be nicely layered on top of the basic message mechanism), and > at the same meeting seem to be more open to the more specialised attribute > syntax! Fair concern ;-). The difference IMO is that the attribute stuff I proposed really translates to *two* operations in our current syntactic model. Thus, its something that cannot be done easily with the current syntax .. whereas the RPC style *can* be done with the current syntax. YMMV, clearly. Sanjiva.
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:27:34 UTC