W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2003

Re: HTTP binding options

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:34:07 -0500
To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Cc: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20031119143407.K27273@www.markbaker.ca>

And when people confuse transfer with transport? 8-)

(we could probably go on ... 8-)

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:27:09AM -0800, Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:
> And when people confuse the transport with the end-to-end information
> :-)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Mark Baker
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:21 AM
> > To: David Orchard
> > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: HTTP binding options
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:35PM -0500, David Orchard wrote:
> > > I think I am saying that is a feature not a bug.  In the case of a
> > banking customer I was talking to, they want the transaction # in the
> URL.
> > >
> > > Does this mess things up in the "infoset uber alles" approach?
> > 
> > Don't you hate it when customers prefer that the architecture not be
> > protocol independent? 8-)
> > 
> > Mark.
> 

-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 14:32:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT