W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > November 2003

Re: HTTP binding options

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:03:29 -0500
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20031110090329.K27293@www.markbaker.ca>

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:51:23PM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Secondly, I'm not sure that (5) adheres to REST principles. One of the
> motivations for the HTTP binding is to support RESTers .. so if it
> contradicts then its not good. Can we hear from REST proponents? Mark?
> Others? 

I'd say that Arthur's earlier report[1] on REST & urlReplacement sums up
my views pretty well (with the one exception noted in my response[2]).

 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0059.html
 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0063.html

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 09:01:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT