- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:03:29 -0500
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: Web Services Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:51:23PM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > Secondly, I'm not sure that (5) adheres to REST principles. One of the > motivations for the HTTP binding is to support RESTers .. so if it > contradicts then its not good. Can we hear from REST proponents? Mark? > Others? I'd say that Arthur's earlier report[1] on REST & urlReplacement sums up my views pretty well (with the one exception noted in my response[2]). [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0059.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0063.html Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 09:01:44 UTC