RE: Why single-interface is broken

> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> 
> Redundancy is *bad*.  Specifying interface twice is *bad*.  If it's
> going to happen at all, error-handling MUST be specified in sufficient
> detail that two processors faced with the same description report the
> same thing.

I don't disagree with your other points, but want to point out that
there is a proposal on the table to eliminate the specification of an
interface (was portType) on the binding to eliminate the redundancy
between the service/@interface and binding/@interface.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0046.html

--Jeff