W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2003

RE: /service/@targetResource ?

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:09:39 -0700
To: "'Christopher B Ferris'" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c3252e$06685510$630ba8c0@beasys.com>

righto.  I went down the endpoint rabbit hole for too long.  Hence why it
changed name to "role", right? :-)

Seems like a good thing to describe in the ws-arch work that is documenting
the wsdl and soap models.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Christopher B Ferris
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:11 PM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: 'Arthur Ryman'; www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ?
>
>
>
> Dave,
>
> SOAP1.2's @role does not specify an endpoint, it specifies a role. An
> endpoint can
> assume a role, but that is no different than an actor
> assuming a character
> role
> in a play. There can be many actors who play the role and an
> actor can
> take on multiple roles (even in the same play!)
>
> http://w3.org/2003/05/ultimateReceiver is not an endpoint
> URI, it is a URI
> that identifies
> a role, nothing more, nothing less.
>
> There is no spoon,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> phone: +1 508 234 3624
>
> www-ws-desc-request@w3.org wrote on 05/27/2003 06:57:26 PM:
>
> > Wow, my understanding suddenly disappeared.  I thought the
> @role was
> used for specifying an
> > endpoint.  Should @role now mean service?
> >
> > This is a very fascinating point, about whether roles mean
> endpoints,
> services, or targetResources.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:45 PM
> > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ?
>
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > I think @targetResource is similar in concept to the
> ultimate receiver
> in the SOAP processing
> > model. However, the ultimate receiver might still be a piece of the
> processing machinery as
> > opposed to identifying the resource associated with the service.
> >
> > Arthur Ryman,
> >
> >
>
> >
> > "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
> > Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
> > 05/19/2003 09:11 PM
> >
> >
> >         To:        "Newcomer, Eric"
> <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, Arthur
> Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,
> > <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> >         cc:
> >         Subject:        RE: /service/@targetResource ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Does the value of
> wsdl:definitions/wsdl:service/@targetResource relate
> to the SOAP 1.2 @role?
> >
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2003 12:38:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:24 GMT