RE: /service/@targetResource ?

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:57:26 -0700 To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org> Message-ID: <008701c324a3$58a7b180$fefb000a@beasys.com> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:14:35 GMT

Wow, my understanding suddenly disappeared.  I thought the @role was used
for specifying an endpoint.  Should @role now mean service?

This is a very fascinating point, about whether roles mean endpoints,
services, or targetResources.

Cheers,
Dave
  -----Original Message-----
  From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
  Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:45 PM
  To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
  Subject: RE: /service/@targetResource ?

  Jeff,

  I think @targetResource is similar in concept to the ultimate receiver in
the SOAP processing model. However, the ultimate receiver might still be a
piece of the processing machinery as opposed to identifying the resource
associated with the service.

  Arthur Ryman,

       "Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
        Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
        05/19/2003 09:11 PM

                To:        "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, Arthur
Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
                cc:
                Subject:        RE: /service/@targetResource ?

  Does the value of wsdl:definitions/wsdl:service/@targetResource relate to
the SOAP 1.2 @role?