RE: /service/@targetResource ?

> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> 
> Is it the intended semantics that two services with the same value of
> @targetResource (or whatever it ends up being called) with ports of
the
> same interface, a client may use either of the service to reach the
same
> thing?

Yes, where "same thing" was the problematic bit to define; as an
improvement over "semantically equivalent" wording in WSDL 1.1, we used
the "resource" wording proposed by IBM\Arthur.

> If not, someone please describe the semantics.
> 
> If yes, we're basically splitting the old service construct into a
> number of the new service constructs limited to one interface each,
> linked together by the value of the new attribute, right?

That's my understanding.