W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2003

RE: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:26:36 -0700
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>, "'Amelia A. Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002601c30f99$db27fdf0$ff16000a@beasys.com>

I guess I should have generalized my question.  What I meant was, how many
proposals that allow a WSD to specify which endpoints of a specific
interface in a service are semantically equivalent.  One was offered at [1].
Restricting a service to a single interface is another technique that
achieves that requirement.

Cheers,
Dave

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0059.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 7:27 PM
> To: David Orchard; 'Amelia A. Lewis'; 'Arthur Ryman'
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface
>
>
> There's only one proposal AFAIK .. add an "interface" attribute
> to <service> and fix up bindings appropriately. I am working
> on simplifying the bindings right now.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
> To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "'David
> Orchard'"
> <dorchard@bea.com>; "'Amelia A. Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>;
> "'Arthur Ryman'"
> <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
> Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 4:05 AM
> Subject: RE: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface
>
>
> > How many are there for the restricting # of interfaces?
> You say "the
> > interface-per-service", but there are at least 2 different
> ways of doing
> > that.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:14 PM
> > > To: David Orchard; 'Amelia A. Lewis'; 'Arthur Ryman'
> > > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: proposal for restricting a service to a
> single interface
> > >
> > > <snip/>
> > > > Out of curiousity, how many "proposals" are out there?  I
> > > would love to be
> > > > able to compare and contrast all the different ones.  The
> > > ones I know of
> > > > are: Arthur's, mine, Amy's, status quo.
> > >
> > > We are discussing two independent proposals: one about restricting
> > > the number of interfaces supported by <service> and
> another related
> > > to R-085. The comment from Amy was related to the
> > > interfaces-per-service
> > > proposal: she finds my proposal to restrict a service to
> one interface
> > > valueless. I obviously disagree.
> > >
> > > W.r.t. Arthur's proposal for R-085, I am confused as to where
> > > we stand;
> > > I see most discussion terminating postively but I could
> be biased in
> > > my interpretation.
> > >
> > > Sanjiva.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 00:24:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:24 GMT