W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2003

RE: Minutes of W3C WSDWG Conference Call, June 26th, 2003

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:37:54 -0700
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <020001c33cca$7624f620$7106a8c0@beasys.com>

Indeed.  This is why I framed my response the way I did.  I haven't been
able to figure out if new information is available - like the design doesn't
allow some implementations, it's made things too complicated, it can't be
validated in schema, or something new.

I've seen a couple messages of the type "didn't like it then and don't like
it now", which imho isn't really strong enough a reason to open up a
decision.
Maybe if there was more of the "didn't like it then, and here's a better
solution for those use cases that motivated the change so we get to
consensus" kind, but I haven't seen those either.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 5:06 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Minutes of W3C WSDWG Conference Call, June 26th, 2003
>
>
>
> "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> writes:
> >
> > BEA strongly believes that this decision shouldn't be
> revisited, or it
> > should be re-affirmed.  The right decision was made at the
> F2F, and I'm
> not
> > sure what new information is available.
>
> This raises an interesting process question for me- as far as I
> can tell there is no new information now from the time we made
> the decisions that are currently spec'ed. So should we be
> discussing it etc. etc.? Some people don't like it, but if we
> don't have some process then its a waste of time going to the
> F2Fs as those decisions are likely to be much more contentious
> in the wider group as F2F has like 10-20 people and this list
> has a lot. So if we re-open everything clearly its non-productive
> to go to the F2F.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 12:48:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT