W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2003

Re: targetResource wording

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:19:11 -0400
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7FD7B9A9-A689-11D7-B80D-0003936A0B26@isr.umd.edu>

On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 06:04 PM, David Booth wrote:

> At 10:48 PM 6/20/2003 +0100, Savas Parastatidis wrote:
>> So, I guess it's a matter of preference. The @targetResource 
>> introduces
>> identity to a web service . . . .
>
> Careful.  The targetResource doesn't identify the *service*, it 
> identifies some *other* resource that the service "manipulates".  We 
> don't have an accepted term for that "other resource".  In the WS 
> Architecture WG we've been calling it a "turtle". :)

How about "serviceTarget"?

Still redundant, but perhaps less controversial :)

Cheers,
Bijan "Trying to Solve Deep Theorical Issues with New Terminology" 
Parsia.
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 17:14:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT