Re: WSDL 1.2 drafts update

This apparently went off the editor's radar screen, sorry; no malicious 
intent meant.

It's now in the edtodo, so it will get done.

Again, apologies.

Jean-Jacques.

Liu, Kevin wrote:

> I have just had a quick browse of the drafts. Overall I like the new drafts and certainly appreciate the editors' great job to incorporate the WG decisions in the latest draft.
> 
> Just noticed, with a bit surprise, that some typos and unclarity SAP humbly submitted have not been addressed. I sent 5 comments to the group list on end of April (see [1]). The group discussed the comments in May 8 (see [2]) and decided that "The editors will add the comments as a new issue". But obviously the typos and the insularity remain the same in the public draft. I am under the impression that the group agreed that we need to fix the typos and insularity in the publication. Am I missing anything here? If the group made a different decision that I am not aware of, can someone point me to the minutes?  
> 
> Best Regards, 
> Kevin 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/0166.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0037.html
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 8:17 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: WSDL 1.2 drafts update
> 
> 
> 
> FYI, Parts 1, 2, and 3 have been updated. See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#public_drafts
> 
> Philippe
>

Received on Thursday, 19 June 2003 05:45:58 UTC