W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2003

Re: targetResource wording

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 09:20:05 -0400
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030616092005.G21044@www.markbaker.ca>

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 06:38:19AM -0600, Champion, Mike wrote:
> Not every resource identifier is a reasonable value for a WSDL
> targetResource, but there is a fairly broad range of URIs that make sense,
> so leveraging the TAG's definition *with the qualifier* that it is a "WSDL
> target" resource makes perfect sense to me.  There's enough substantive
> disagreement over this concept and whether it is valuable to WSDL  that I
> don't think worrying about the finer points of terminology is productive at
> the moment. 

Well, that finer point of terminology seemed to be responsible for
confusing several people, including some Web services proponents.  So I
respectfully disagree that it isn't worth worrying about.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 09:15:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT