- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 14:05:22 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:51:07PM +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > So why not have the spec mint a URI which identifies a resource > > which represents *every* other resource (i.e. every resource > > everywhere, that exists, has existed, or will exist)? Then > > you won't need targetResource at all, as it can be assumed > > that its value will always be this URI. > > Huh? Either I don't understand what you said or you have > totally misunderstood the purpose of @targetResource. The former, I believe. Ok, rather than dig deeper into that admitedly esoteric example, let me boil this down to a simple position statement ... The resource(s) that a service uses are part of the implementation of a service, not its interface. Please don't conflate the two. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2003 14:01:17 UTC