W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > June 2003

Draft wording for targetResource attribute

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:19:02 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030605132812.02eb3200@localhost>
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org

The current draft wording on targetResource[1] says: "The targetResource 
attribute information item identifies the resource that the service is a 
representation of."

1. This wording seems to be using the term "representation" in a way that 
is different from the usage in the TAG's Web Architecture 
document[2].  Wherever possible, I think we should be consistent with the 
WebArch's use of terms.

2. This wording also seems unnecessarily restrictive.  The targetResource 
indicates a relationship between the WSDL service and some other 
resource.  Although one good use of it is to indicate that two WSDL 
services operate on the same physical object (such as a printer), it seems 
to me that: (a) the exact nature of the relationship will always depend on 
the semantics of the particular application or service that is defined; and 
(b) there may be other legitimate uses that don't necessarily involve the 
same physical object.  For this reason I think we are best off saying as 
little as possible about it in our spec.

Accordingly, I propose changing the above wording to something like: "The 
targetResource attribute information item identifies a resource that is 
related to the service.  The nature of the relationship depends on the 
semantics of the service."

Comments?

1. WSDL 1.2 draft: 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html#Service_resource_attribute 


2. TAG Web Arch: http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#representations


-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:19:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT