Hi, the action below is the third version of my action item I see. 8-) > PENDING 2003-05-22: Jacek to see how test assertions could be > expressed in RDF (and OWL in particular). When I originally wrote the item in IRC, according to my log it looked like this: May 22 17:30:21 <JacekK> ACTION: see how assertions in RDF (and OWL in particular) could go in WSDL This action I have fulfilled in [1] and the subsequent thread by proposing different ways of putting RDF in WSDL. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0076.html Then Arthur said in [2] he understood my action as: "to look at using OWL in our WSDL Specification to encode the assertions that could not be expressed using XML Schema." [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0077.html This I haven't investigated much yet except for the initial thoughts written in my reply [3] to Arthur's email. [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0082.html I don't think I wanted to investigate how to express our test assertions in RDF, as I don't even know the test assertions yet. 8-) Hope the situation clears soon, 8-) Jacek Kopecky Senior Architect Systinet Corporation http://www.systinet.com/Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 08:51:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT