W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2003

RE: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description WG FTF

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:59:22 -0700
Message-ID: <DF1BAFBC28DF694A823C9A8400E71EA297D01B@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

OK thanks, fixed that in the upcoming revision.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Savas Parastatidis [mailto:Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:27 PM
> To: Jonathan Marsh; Sanjiva Weerawarana; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description WG
FTF
> 
> Jonathan,
> 
> The message to which you referred contained the wrong attachment. In
the
> same thread, Jim sent the correct version of the document that
included
> our proposal.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0021.html
> 
> The proposal was about a declarative way to expose supported or
required
> functionality in a WSDL interface. We were not aware of the properties
> and features TF when we wrote and sent that document. Although we
still
> believe that our proposal is simpler than the current
> features/properties approach, we are glad that WSDL will provide this
> kind of functionality in some form. That is why we didn't pursue this
> further.
> 
> If the WSDL WG still decides to consider our proposal, we would be
happy
> to provide more information.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Savas Parastatidis
> http://savas.parastatidis.name
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: 25 July 2003 21:59
> > To: Sanjiva Weerawarana; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description
WG
> FTF
> >
> >
> > We really haven't had any meaningful discussion on this proposal
yet.
> > The proposal is from Jim Webber (non-WG member) and spun off of the
> > Issue 2 discussion, which is why I've been tracking it.  Time
> allowing,
> > it would be good to get an overview from a WG member who has
reviewed
> it
> > and see if we there is enough interest to develop a champion to
> further
> > it within the WG.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
[mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> > On
> > > Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:20 PM
> > > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: [rev 1] Agenda: 30 July - 1 Augst 2003 WS Description
> WG
> > FTF
> > >
> > >
> > > "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> writes:
> > > >     - Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in
> WSDL
> > > > [.3].
> > > >
> > > ..
> > > >  [.3]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0020.html
> > >
> > > I must've missed this discussion as I don't remember it at all.
> > >
> > > Is this basically in the space of properties & features and thus
> > > also WS-Policy*? WS-Policy in particular has stuff like supported,
> > > rejected etc. hence the question.
> > >
> > > Sanjiva.
> >
> 
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 14:59:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT