W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2003

RE: eliminating <message>: a few additional thoughts

From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 23:15:28 +0100
Message-ID: <BC28A9E979C56C44BCBC2DED313A447001EC32A8@bond.ncl.ac.uk>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Resending this... It's been two hours since it was sent but it has yet
to appear...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Savas Parastatidis
> Sent: 21 July 2003 21:13
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: eliminating <message>: a few additional thoughts
> 
> Sanjiva,
> 
> A quick question...
> 
> In either of the approaches (i.e., @element or @body) how are you
planning
> to serialise the information about the operation in SOAP? Will the
name of
> the operation become an attribute of the SOAP <body> element or will
it be
> a child of <body>? If it is the latter, then the discussion of @body
vs
> @element is not that relevant.
> 
> What I mean is that the element representing the operation will
contain
> the XML instance described by the @element or @body.
> 
> Am I missing something obvious here?
> --
> Savas Parastatidis
> http://savas.parastatidis.name
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 18:15:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT