W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2003

RE: Agenda, 17 July 2003 WS Desc telcon

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:52:05 -0400
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF0FBDF5F7.0280BC62-ON85256D66.00565F42-85256D66.00572AAF@us.ibm.com>

I don't understand, Sanjiva has made a proposal on the list. To date, I 
have seen
no mention of "programmng hints" in any of the (admittedly limited) 
discussion
around his proposal.

What is is that you mean by this?

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624

www-ws-desc-request@w3.org wrote on 07/17/2003 10:56:04 AM:

> 
> Removing message will remain in flux until we see a proposal for adding
> "programming hints".
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:02 AM
> > To: Jonathan Marsh; www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Agenda, 17 July 2003 WS Desc telcon
> > 
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > Is there any chance of moving the <message> discussion much
> > higher on the agenda today?
> > 
> > I think it fell off the agenda last week (I had to drop off
> > early) and since the single interface thing is before that
> > I fear that we may never get to it. Same concern for the
> > binding changes .. we seem to be stuck on one little (IMO)
> > point and unable to make progress on other things. To me,
> > without committing to what we're doing or not doing to
> > <message> all the binding stuff is in total flux.
> > 
> > Sanjiva.
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
> > To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:13 AM
> > Subject: Agenda, 17 July 2003 WS Desc telcon
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > 0.  Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
> > >
> > > See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and
> other
> > > information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
> > >
> > > If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG
> list
> > > before the start of the telcon.
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003Jul/0023.html
> > > [.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
> > > [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Agenda
> > >
> > > 1.  Assign scribe.  Lucky minute taker for this week is:
> > >       Don Mullen (fallbacks: Adi Sakala, Sandeep Kumar,
> > >       Prasad Yendluri, Dietmar Gaertner, Jerry Thrasher,
> > >       Allen Brooks, Glen Daniels)
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 2.  Approval of minutes:
> > >   - July 10 telcon [.1].  Alan Davies sent belated regrets.
> Jonathan
> > >     asked for two AIs to be recorded [.2].
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0052.html
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0054.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 3.  Review of Action items [.1].
> > > ?         2003-03-13: Don will write a proposal for annotating
> schema
> > >                       with part information.
> > > ?         2003-03-27: Philippe write up a proposal for embedding
> binary
> > >                       data types in schema
> > > ?         2003-05-13: DaveO to send a motivating example for R131.
> > > ?         2003-05-13: Jeffsch, Sanjiva, Glen, Umit, JJM to come up
> with
> > >                       a proposal to get rid with the message
> construct,
> > >                       and add programming hints.
> > > ?         2003-06-12: Jacek to synthesize the different approaches
> > >                       to solving issue 64.
> > > DONE [.2] 2003-07-03: Arthur to figure out which validation mode our
> > >                       schema should specify on xs:any.
> > > ?         2003-07-10: DBooth to reconcile his terminology with that
> > >                       in the requirements doc.
> > > DONE [.3] 2003-07-10: Jonathan to send a summary of the
> @serviceGroup
> > >                       idea to the list.
> > >
> > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
> > > [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0068.html
> > > [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0055.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 4.  Administrivia
> > >   a. July FTF logistics [.1], registration [.2]
> > >   b. Sept FTF logistics [.3] (need registration page)
> > >
> > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/3/05/f2fJulyLogistics.htm
> > > [.2]
> > >
> http://cgi.w3.org/Register/selectUser.pl?_w3c_meetingName=WSAWG_WSDWG_20
> > > 0307
> > > [.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/3/07/f2fSeptLogistics.html
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 5.  Task Force Status.
> > >  a. Properties and Features (dormant)
> > >  b. Patterns
> > >  c. Attributes
> > >  d. QA & Testing
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 6.  New Issues.  Merged issues list [.1].
> > >   - none
> > >
> > > [.1]
> > >
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 7.  Open content model - validate "strict" [.1].
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0068.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 8.  Polishing off single service per interface
> > >     Terminology [.1]  Diagram [.2, .3]
> > >     Alternatives: @targetResource
> > >                   @serviceGroup [.5]
> > >
> > >   - Naming the service resource [.4]
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0018.html
> > > [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0064.html
> > > [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0019.html
> > > [.4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0008.html
> > > [.5]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0055.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 9.  Binding enhancements
> > >     Sanjiva proposes [.1] to:
> > >       1) Drop @interface from binding, since now in service.
> > >       2) Allow inlining interface-wide binding within a port and
> > >          making binding optional.
> > >       3) Define default binding (SOAP doc/lit).
> > >       4) Dealing with operation specific SOAPActions.
> > >     Kevin proposes to [.2]:
> > >       1) Allow reuse of parts of bindings through a BindingDetails
> > >          element and corresponding references.
> > >     Consolidated proposal [.3]
> > >     Amy's feedback [.4]
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0046.html
> > > [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0068.html
> > > [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0017.html
> > > [.4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0051.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 10. Removing message.
> > >     Investigating idea to cleanly separate interop at the message
> > >     format level from interop at the programming model level.
> Proposal
> > >     from Sanjiva [.1]
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jul/0025.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 11. R085 Describing endpoint references.  [.1]
> > >   - General agreement to add such capability to WSDL, but
> > >     not agreement on the precise form of the annotations and
> > >     where in the WSDL they should reside. Proposal
> > >     from Umit [.3], response from Arthur [.4].
> > >   - Related issue (?) dynamic discovery of a service [.2].
> > >
> > > [.1]
> > >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-20
> > > 03-04-22.html
> > > [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0004.html
> > > [.3]
> > >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/att-0024/umit_pr
> > > oposal.html__charset_ISO-8859-1
> > > [.4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jun/0142.html
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 12. Issue 64 [.1] Operations an HTTP verbs (Mark Baker) [.2, .3, .4]
> > >
> > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x64
> > > [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0094.html
> > > [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0103.html
> > > [.4]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0111.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 13. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated, as of SOAP 1.2 [.1].
> > >   - Arthur's proposal to unify property URIs and QName URIs. [.2]
> > >     Alternatives include using property markup, or a QNamed
> > >     attribute.
> > >   - Proposal for advertising QoS features of a Web service in WSDL
> [.3].
> > >
> > > [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x2
> > > [.2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0047.html
> > > [.3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0020.html
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 14. Moving MIME Type Information to the Interface [.1]
> > >     Awaiting proposal from Philippe.
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0028.html
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 15. Using RDF in WSDL [.1].
> > >     Dependent upon RDF mapping first draft.
> > >
> > > [.1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0076.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 11:52:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT