- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:18:56 +0600
- To: "Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Savas Parastatidis" <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk> writes: > Sanjiva, > > So far I have been wrong in both my comments in this thread :-( I hope > it's not going to be the case with this one... ;-) I appreciate your comments anyway as they helped clarify stuff to people. > I like the proposal but I feel that a story about faults needs to be > added. Absolutely. My intent was that a fault would simply be an element .. which in the SOAP case would probably belong somewhere inside the SOAP:Fault element (fault details?). Sanjiva.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2003 03:19:01 UTC