- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:34:22 -0500
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Steve Graham" <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes: > <w:service name='Bar' > > <w:port name='portForA' binding='A' ... /> > <w:port name='portForB' binding='B' ... /> > <w:port name='portForC' binding='C' ... /> > /w:service> Hmm. So the portTypes supported by Bar would be ptA, ptB and ptC. However, Bar is a bit weird because it offers two alternative implementations for ptA: via portForA or portForC. Similarly for portType ptB. Isn't that rather confusing/weird/not-quite-right? Sanjiva.
Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 08:34:59 UTC