W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2003

Re: operation name uniqueness draft available

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:34:22 -0500
Message-ID: <001101c2c3ad$4ec5f570$2e060e09@lankabookwin2k>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Steve Graham" <sggraham@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> writes:
> <w:service name='Bar' >
>   <w:port name='portForA' binding='A' ... />
>   <w:port name='portForB' binding='B' ... />
>   <w:port name='portForC' binding='C' ... />
> /w:service>

Hmm. So the portTypes supported by Bar would be ptA, ptB and ptC.
However, Bar is a bit weird because it offers two alternative
implementations for ptA: via portForA or portForC. Similarly
for portType ptB.

Isn't that rather confusing/weird/not-quite-right?

Sanjiva.
Received on Friday, 24 January 2003 08:34:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT