This looks reasonable to me. I observe that it seems like requirement R130 is a generalization of issue 69. And I do encourage R128 to be accomplished ... :-) Thanks again for the time and the invitation to present and discuss. Cheers, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Jeffrey Schlimmer > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:36 PM > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Web Service Description Requirements > > > > The Web Service Description WG requirements document [1] has > been updated and a new issue added [2] to reflect decisions > from the face to face discussion this morning, primarily > focused around feedback from David Orchard [3]. > > --Jeff > > [1] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/requirements/ > ws-desc-reqs.xml > [2] > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-is > sues.xml#x71 > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/20 > 03Jan/0000.html > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT