Re: write-up of interaction patterns

Either syntax is fine with me, as long as we can carry the 
information described by Glen below.

Jean-Jacques.

Glen Daniels wrote:
> When you lay this into WSDL, I think you need both "what node am I" and "what
> messages in the WSDL correspond to what messages in the MEP description.  An
> example of this would be as follows (using my preferred syntax, natch :)):
> 
> <operation mep="request-response-uri" role="node-B-uri">
>   <input message="someMessage" role="Request"/>
>   <output message="otherMessage" role="Response"/>
> </operation>