W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > January 2003

Re: write-up of interaction patterns

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:06:56 +0100
Message-ID: <3E2BBC30.4050108@crf.canon.fr>
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
CC: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org

Either syntax is fine with me, as long as we can carry the 
information described by Glen below.

Jean-Jacques.

Glen Daniels wrote:
> When you lay this into WSDL, I think you need both "what node am I" and "what
> messages in the WSDL correspond to what messages in the MEP description.  An
> example of this would be as follows (using my preferred syntax, natch :)):
> 
> <operation mep="request-response-uri" role="node-B-uri">
>   <input message="someMessage" role="Request"/>
>   <output message="otherMessage" role="Response"/>
> </operation>
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 04:07:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT