Following the call yesterday, i'm confused why we would need to invent a new schema language just to represent section 5 encoded messages when it's just a flag ATM. I'm also puzzled how other, non-XML serialisations for SOAP could be supported in the future - i'm guessing you'd need to invent a whole new SOAP binding ? Can someone please point me at the reasoning how we lost the encodingStyle on the SOAP binding ? Paul -- Paul Sumner Downey Web Services Integration BT Exact +44(0)1442 296260Received on Friday, 19 December 2003 06:17:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:27 GMT