- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:25:32 +0100
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
+1
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 22:20, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Issue clarify-type-and-element [1], titled "Clarify use of type= and
> element= in part with XML Schema experts" states "The question is
> whether we can just have element and still retain full abstraction or if
> not whether we can just have type and live."
>
> With the removal of the message construct, Interface Operations now have
> Message References, which in turn have a property:
> {message} A reference to an XML element declaration
> and the corresponding message attribute.
>
> Since @type and @element described in this issue have been dropped from
> the schema, and we now refer solely to XML element declarations, this
> issue appears to be obsolete.
>
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#xissue%20clarify%20type%
> 20and%20element
>
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 09:25:36 UTC