W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > August 2003

RE: presentation on removing message

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:37:10 -0700
Message-ID: <DDE1793D7266AD488BB4F5E8D38EACB8023E8BE4@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman

Jeff, 

I reviewed the document and Appendix C, and have the following comments:

[jeffsch: Great!]


1. Section 2.16 Symbol Spaces refers to 4 top level constructs including
Message. Change this to 3 and delete Message. 
[jeffsch: Fixed.

 

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml

]

 

2. Table C-1 is correct except for the fault row. The spec defines
infault and outfault so replace this row by two and use infault and
outfault. 
[jeffsch: Fixed.]


3. We should probably state that if an optional @name attribute is
missing, then the value of the component name is the empty string.
However, we should probably also tighten up the spec to state that even
if the @name attribute is optional, it must uniquely identify the
component, e.g. if there are more than one <input> components then they
must have unique names within the parent <operation>. 
[jeffsch: Section 2.8.1 current states:

"For each Message Reference component in the {message references} and
{fault references} properties of an Interface operation component the
{name} property must be unique. "

Is that sufficient?]


Arthur Ryman 
----- Forwarded by Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM on 08/07/2003 05:10 PM -----


 

Arthur Ryman 

08/05/2003 01:27 PM 


        To:        www-ws-desc@w3.org 
        cc:         
        From:        Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA 
        Subject:        RE: presentation on removing messageLink
<Notes://8525632600612CD8/6498F7528C4A51E285256CAB006E1B2D/4508D241A901A
F2F85256D79005DBB40>  
  






Jeff, 

Thx for updating the spec. I'll review Appendix C.

Arthur Ryman 



 

"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

08/05/2003 01:01 PM 

        
        To:        <www-ws-desc@w3.org> 
        cc:         
        Subject:        RE: presentation on removing message 

       




Per the WG decisions at the Raleigh, NC meeting, the editor's draft of
WSDL 1.2 Part 1 has been updated to remove the WSDL message construct.

This draft includes an encodingStyle attribute on interface/operation.
Given the prior WG decision to roll up attributes on the SOAP binding,
the draft also includes a proposed encodingStyleDefault attribute on
interface that behaves similarly.

A remaining work item is to incorporate a set of encoding rules that may
be used to construct the element declarations.

Please review the draft; for your convenience, changes are marked. In
particular it would be great to have the contributors of Appendix C:
"URI References for WSDL constructs" and Appendix E: "Examples of
Specifications of Extension Elements for Alternative Schema Language
Support" review these sections carefully.
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xsd

--Jeff

[1] 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: presentation on removing message
> 
Received on Friday, 8 August 2003 12:37:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:25 GMT