- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:21:25 +0600
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
"Jeffrey Schlimmer" <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com> writes: > > Per the WG decisions at the Raleigh, NC meeting, the following issues appear to be closed and are so marked. > > issue eliminate message > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml > > 33: Distinction between RCP and document style > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x33 > > 6c: Can part reference global element declaration instead of type? > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x6c > > 12: Bug in schema for part > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x12 > > 74: Clarify name for parts in SOAP binding > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x74 +1. > The following issues may be closed; perhaps the WG can review them when work resumes after the August rest to determine whether anything more needs to be done. > > 27: Remove 'style' attribute > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x27 > > 39: Binding extensions depend on structure of portType > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x39 > > 40: Binding extensions for SOAP interact in a complex way > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x40 > > 45: fault/@use should be optional > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x45 > > 48: soap:body/@use should be optional > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x48 > > 63: soap binding violates separation of abstract and concrete > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.xml#x63 +1 for closing these as well. Wow, we got a lot done .. Sanjiva.
Received on Sunday, 3 August 2003 22:22:01 UTC