W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2003

RE: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:05:05 -0700
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'David Orchard'" <dorchard@bea.com>, "'Amelia A. Lewis'" <alewis@tibco.com>, "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00b501c30f64$8f30c470$910ba8c0@beasys.com>

How many are there for the restricting # of interfaces?  You say "the
interface-per-service", but there are at least 2 different ways of doing

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 2:14 PM
> To: David Orchard; 'Amelia A. Lewis'; 'Arthur Ryman'
> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Subject: Re: proposal for restricting a service to a single interface
> <snip/>
> > Out of curiousity, how many "proposals" are out there?  I
> would love to be
> > able to compare and contrast all the different ones.  The
> ones I know of
> > are: Arthur's, mine, Amy's, status quo.
> We are discussing two independent proposals: one about restricting
> the number of interfaces supported by <service> and another related
> to R-085. The comment from Amy was related to the
> interfaces-per-service
> proposal: she finds my proposal to restrict a service to one interface
> valueless. I obviously disagree.
> W.r.t. Arthur's proposal for R-085, I am confused as to where
> we stand;
> I see most discussion terminating postively but I could be biased in
> my interpretation.
> Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 18:02:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:23 GMT