W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 16:41:55 +0200
Message-ID: <3D776D33.2060108@crf.canon.fr>
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
CC: Web Service Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Sounds like i'm reading too fast today... but are you not our 
official schema maintainer? ;-)

Jean-Jacques.


Martin Gudgin wrote:
> Isn't it in the binding spec? whatever, the fix is as follows
> 
> Add 
> 
> <sequence>
>   <any namespace="##any" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"
> processContents="lax" /> 
> </sequence>
> 
> inside the <restriction> element, before the attribute declaration
> 
> Gudge
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
>>Sent: 05 September 2002 14:42
>>To: Web Service Description
>>Subject: Re: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2
>>
>>
>>
>>Sounds like a new issue for part 1.
>>
>>Jean-Jacques.
>>
>>
>>>To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
>>>From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
>>>Date: 18 Jul 2002 12:20:23 +0100
>>>Message-ID: <f5b1ya1705k.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
>>>Subject: Broken schema example in WSDL 1.2
>>>
>>>
>>>The schema in example 3, section 2.1 [1], is broken -- it will not 
>>>allow any content in the output, because the ArrayOfFloat type 
>>>restricts soapenc:Array to have empty content.
>>>
>>>This is an egregious error, easy to fix, and persists from previous
>>>versions: if you need help from the Schema WG I'm sure we'd 
>>
>>be glad to 
>>
>>>provide it if asked.
>>>
>>>ht
>>>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-wsdl12-bindings-20020709/#_soap-e
>>>-- 
>>>  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, 
>>
>>University of Edinburgh
>>
>>>          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
>>>     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 
>>
>>131 650-4440
>>
>>>	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
>>>		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>>> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is 
>>>forged spam]
>>>
>>
>>
> 
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 10:41:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT