- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Date: 05 Sep 2002 16:30:40 +0200
- To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: Liu Kevin <kevin.liu@sap.com>, WS Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Jean-Jacques, 8-)
I was only wondering if this was really the intention, because I felt
that this implication was not obvious.
I can see it both ways - keeping one soap:body element (because a Body
is one thing) or allowing multiple soap:body elements (to simplify some
applications that really do carry multiple separate and different pieces
of data in SOAP Body).
Best regards,
Jacek Kopecky
Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
http://www.systinet.com/
On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 15:18, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
> Would this be a real problem? I can see how I could reuse code if
> this change was made; today, I cannot. Also, I am unable today to
> specify properties separately for each body block.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> > Jean-Jacques,
> > renaming soap:body/@parts to soap:body/@part would necessitate that we
> > also allow multiple soap:body elements in wsdl:input|output elements,
> > which is not currently allowed.
> > I wonder whether this is your intention?
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 10:30:44 UTC