W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > September 2002

Re: WSDL 1.2 Draft

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:40:43 +0200
Message-ID: <3D775EDB.9020503@crf.canon.fr>
To: Web Service Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

I think this issue is being addressed by the abstract model. So 
no need to open a new issue, in my view.

Jean-Jacques.

> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:50:09 -0700
> Message-ID: <AD77174F26BFD411BE7B00508BFDF5621A8586@newbury.netsilicon.com>
> From: "Jones, Matthew" <MJones@NetSilicon.com>
> To: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
> Subject: WSDL 1.2 Draft
> 
> 
> First of all may I suggest a normative grammer.  I don't think it is ever appropriate to put non-normative infomation in a specification.  Grammers are a lot easier for most people to read and so where possible I suggest using a lexer/parser grammer instead of prose.
> 
> Second there seems to be a disconnect between the grammer in section 3.11 and the actual document when it comes to the documentation element.  For example in section 3.5 for message it does not say anthing about message containing a documentation element and yet it does in section 3.11.  I believe this conflict with regard to the documentation element occurs in many places in the draft.
> 
> Matthew Jones
> mjones@netsilicon.com
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 09:40:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT