proposal for equivalence of top level items

I have a pending action item to propose equivalence rules for
top level items. Here it is, finally:

schema stuff:
    out of scope

<message>
    messages m1 and m2 are equivalent iff their QNames are the same
    (i.e., equal - using rules which someone else has defined for
    QName equivalence .. if these don't exist then we can define them)

<portType>
    pt1 and pt2 equivalent iff their QNames are the same

<binding>
    iff QNames are equivalent

<service>
    iff QNames are equivalent

So basically its name equivalence for all ..

Bye,

Sanjiva.