Unfortunately this doesn't work either in all cases. The <xs:schema> would have to have the same targetNamespace as the <include>d schema. And if the included file contained the *entire* set of components for the namespace, this would work. However, the <include>d file could <include> other schema documents which would *not* get pulled in. I can give a more specific example if needed. This also has the same limitations as an <import> with forced/required location. In an XML environment that includes schema provisioning/caching, it is sometimes best to only use the namespace, instead of location. Don -----Original Message----- From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 7:28 PM To: Don Mullen Cc: Amy Lewis; 'Jacek Kopecky'; WS Description WG; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org Subject: RE: Importing schemata into WSDL Jacek's points are well taken. Why not then leverage xs:include as that would seem to be more approriate given Jacek's points. e.g. <wsdl:types> <xs:schema ...> <xs:include schemaLocation="http://example.org/yadda/mystuff.xsd"/> </xs:schema> </wsdl:types> Cheers, Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 20:41:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT